- Paul Campos' Weblog on ChooseAbility.org

Stuff for people with disabilities and other cool stuff too.

Sunday, August 31, 2003

Old news, but worth telling.
wired talks about aol troubles

Thursday, August 28, 2003

Mars is closest it has ever been to the Earth!
Wired.com explains it all, plus some other good stuff.

Wednesday, August 20, 2003

This Wired story is "Blogging" great! Enjoy.

Tuesday, August 19, 2003

We're all geeks now

Boston Globe

Sunday, August 17, 2003

Wireless Useless in Blackout

Very interesting article in Wired

Definitely something to think about.
Ahaa!

Experts Warned of Weak Power Grid

Wired

Saturday, August 16, 2003

I was in the middle of posting this story when the Black Out of 2003 hit. Oh well, you're getting it now.

The iBOT gets approved by the FDA! Check it out on cbs news. I can't even get a motorized wheelchair at half the price (I've been waiting over a year to get my new chair). Anyway, enjoy the article.

Tuesday, August 12, 2003

Rocky Mountain News posted an op ed piece criticizing a lawsuit brought by Scot Hollenbeck and two other paralympic athletes. They're suing the U.S. Olympic Committee for discrimination. The author makes some seemingly good points. For example, (from article) -- After all, direct spending on Paralympic athletes has mushroomed in recent years, from $7.7 million for the 1996-2000 Olympic cycle to $15 million in the current four-year period. A further funding boost of more than 25 percent is projected for the period beginning in 2005.

In the last two years alone, the USOC has created a special arm to manage Paralympic athletes. It has souped up the search for commercial sponsors (with heartening success), identified the main need of disabled athletes (expert coaching) and begun filling it, and worked to establish performance-based criteria so that athletes know how they can qualify for direct funding and other benefits.


So, why the lawsuit? Have these athletes lost touch with reality? Assuming everything brought out in this piece is true, what would be the reasons for filing such a lawsuit?

Consider this article in iCan Online. Although the three athletes' reasons for suing are made clearer, I can't help but feel there's more behind this lawsuit. Could it be Mr. Hollenbeck feels slighted because the USOC didn’t allow him to participate in the opening ceremonies of the 2002 Paralympics, or is it because the USOC ended the relationship with Vie Sports Marketing (a company formed by Scot Hollenbeck)? I would love to see a debate between USOC spokesman, Darryl Seibel and Scot Hollenbeck on MSNBC or FoxNews. Getting a good look at their expressions may tell us a lot.

As for me, I would like to believe this lawsuit will bring about a positive result. I’m not so sure it will, though. If it is true, as was written in bijournals.com that the USOC admits it does discriminate, it will be curious to see how the court rules in this case. What concerns me is that this lawsuit could create a backlash against the athletes, which could ruin the tremendous strides already made in the paralympics. After all, the success of the 2002 Salt Lake City Paraympic Games was enough to make a believer out of me, so much so, it caused me to rant about disability sports in general, the potential of the Paralympics to be a commercial success in television ( i.e. A&E’s wonderful coverage) and how that success could be used to catapult people with disabilities into the mainstream. People who are nondisabled and have seen the paralympics tell me they come away exhilarated from the experience. Having watched it on A&E, I know exactly what they’re talking about.

Let’s just hope for everyone’s sake the lawsuit is legitimate, and that regardless of the outcome, the Paralympics and their athletes continue to shine.
Gene Therapy Advances on Parkinson's Disease
Technology Review
Bone Marrow Mends Broken Hearts
wired

Friday, August 08, 2003

The Guardian has great news for people who have websites (or planning to build one) with small content. Great read.

Tuesday, August 05, 2003

This BBC article gives the Recording Industry Association of America much to think about. If I were the (RIAA) I would definitely begin learning to sing a different tune. Enjoy the read.

Saturday, August 02, 2003

Republican Senator Norm Coleman from Minnesota is trying to find out if what the Recording Industry is doing is up to snuff, according to this Wired.com article. As you will see, his concerns are good ones.

Excerpt from article:
Coleman, who has two children, admitted that he's faced the issue himself as a parent.

"I've had this problem in my family," Coleman said. "I'm sure my children have used file-sharing programs."

"I have confessed to using Napster," he said, adding that he does not use any file-sharing programs anymore.

In his letter to Sherman, Coleman writes that he's also concerned about the barrage of subpoenas at the Washington, D.C., district court that has created "such a backlog" that the courthouse has reassigned clerks to help with the paperwork.